The Doctrine of Karma and Why Don't We Know It

Jan 29, 2025

In this article, I want to present "a scoop. " I don't know yet if it will work, but maybe I'll give it a try.The idea is that a religion with Indo-European roots was once invented in India, "karma"; I will first mention a few personal experiences below as to why I think karma really works.

Then follows a historical piece; I have the impression that this idea of ​​karma was stolen; in this case, specifically by the Jews, like car thieves do: steal, repaint preferably with a dark color so that the original is not visible anymore, like with dark stories about an angry God and a talking snake, and sell it to make money.

If the world finds out, I'll be curious; below I compare it to the Epstein files. You could say they repainted the old karma texts, but you could also say they raped them.

1 karma: keeping annoying people at bay

First, a few boring things to illustrate how karma can work. A simple practical example of karma in social relations.I saw all these cool toys I wanted to run to when I first arrived at preschool: wow, cool pedal car. But the teacher said, "Will you join the circle, Maurice?"

I asked, "Why?" She replied, "We always do it that way!" My reaction was, "I didn't ask how often you do that, I asked why." So I walked away.

The teacher responded with something like, "Oh, that kid isn't listening to me, he's just walking to the pedal car." Hee hee, I'll quickly take a picture of him, such a strange kid!

My thought: you're so busy! Aren't you familiar with the principle of karma? If I don't get an answer to my question, you won't have a child in your circle.

This is about a childhood experience, but you don't have to be old to understand it, karma: that simple.Back in kindergarten: I wanted to read a book, but the teacher didn't believe a toddler could read. I read the first page, and then she said, "Your mother must have read that to you often, that you know it by heart!"

I thought: Are you just trying to downplay me? So I said: Should I read the last page too, if you don't believe me? Then I read the last page, and then she gave me an angry look! So I walked away again: "Don't you know the law of karma? If you're not nice, I'll be nice too.

2 In the car

You might not associate these kinds of things with karma: a bit of back and forth between you and the teacher.

But let's look a little further. That you can escape social conventions, a few snobbish teachers, might not be all that impressive, although I can argue in my defense that I was quite young, and a first day of preschool is quite something.

But it gets even more interesting, if this were true in reality, that you can escape not only annoying people, but possibly accidents as well.

For example, when I was five, I was in the car when my father died, who was behind the steering wheel. I was a bit defiant again: what on earth is this!?!? I tend not to panic, but be defiant.

Normally, that car should have gone off the road: hit a pole on the left, a house on the right, or collided with other road users. That didn't happen: through the bend, 250 meters further, safely through an intersection, and another 250 meters further, the car turned around in a parking spot, just in front of the priority road.

A police officer who arrived at the scene said to my mother: Wow, he was incredibly lucky!

A somewhat ironic statement to someone whose husband had just died, so I guess the officer must have been very surprised. But it was too strange, and although the officer refused to call it anything other than luck, perhaps that's why it wasn't luck, but karma.

The underlying idea: if I don't want to sit in a circle, I won't sit in a circle; and if I don't want to fly out of the bent, I won't fly out of the bent; would that be the same?

I'm not saying the opposite; you don't have to be guilty if you do get sick; but you might not have your "protection", if you give up your defiance; you're in the risk zone, where anything can happen, not the risk-free zone.

As strange as this is, nothing is ruled out; Reality consists of potential energy, and if you study physics, you can see that potential energy can transform into all sorts of things: all different kinds of physical activity.

3. Creating a Diagram

Perhaps you find these thoughts too dreamy. But I've tried to professionalize it; see the diagram below.

In religious and philosophical texts, they often juxtapose nature and people as two categories: good idea, I do that too, like a company balance sheet with “nature” under Assets and “people” under Liabilities.

They seem not to know how to connect them. But you can, consider: on the Liabilities side, add “thinking capacity”; and on the Assets side “life quality”; and as it is a balance sheet, it should be equal: thinking capacity = life quality.

Figure, see below: if, for example, cognitive capacity is 70%, then quality of life is also 70%.

Here, I've defined 70% as "resting value": how high is your resting value? If you're above 50%, you might be doing well.

For example, if the teacher starts ranting about how toddlers can't read, you remain undisturbed and calmly pick up another page to read; if she keeps bother you, you just walk away as if she doesn’t exist.

Or if your father’s in the car stops answering questions and being responsive, you might panic. But you could also consider another scenario: maybe he's just in a bad mood, so let's just wait and see; and a car drives on.

Or if you're approaching an intersection, you might panic if there's no car coming from the right. Or you might think, if there's no cyclist coming from the right, they're going to die. Let's just pay attention and warn them if necessary. And no one comes

Or if you're approaching a priority road, you can panic and say: I'm going to die, but you go instead: poor soul, if he's not dead now, he'll die right there. At least I don't have to worry about whether he's still alive and can just calmly wait; and the car pulls over.

II Practical Implementation

I had already written this theory four years ago. I wanted to earn money with it or get a university job. The intention was to further investigate it professionally.

Nowadays, people have no idea how the world works; they sigh: man proposes and God disposes, and perform endless rituals to avert God's wrath; in that respect, they are no further along than in prehistoric times, because they were the same back then.

But nowadays you also have quantum physics; we know the principle that the observer's perception influences the outcome of physical processes, and you can also conduct further research into the concept of "resting value," which is also something from physics.

So, plenty to do at university with research. But that didn't work out, and I blame myself for that: possibly because I'm too different. Professors do not accept a research proposal in this field, because they don't believe it's possible; same as in my start at school: small kids can’t read, so they can’t. And then I do what I always do in such situations: avoid conflict and walk away.

But perhaps this time I'll come up with a solution. I have another idea, my last one, actually, and it came to me when I saw all that fuss about the Epstein files in the news lately.

Because, while researching how karma works, I also discovered what other people did with that knowledge. They already knew, I think and they covered it up! They "raped" the ancient texts; or, a more benign example that I'll use below, "repainted them like a bunch of car thieves."

1 What have people done?

If you have a schema, then you say "thinking capacity is up," which means "quality of life is up"; a simple formula. But what have people done with it? Why don't we know about this?

It seems that the idea of ​​karma fell into the hands of a few lets say Jewish bandits.

They got their hands on it, first and foremost. The schema I show above is found in Genesis chapter one through four. First, two chapters on nature, two creation stories; and then two chapters on people; these are neatly placed side by side, like a company balance sheet: very clever, very good.

But they repainted it, like car thieves repainting a car. So they kept the original scheme, but painted over it with a story

And preferably a dark layer so you can no longer see the original; a dark story about God and a talking snake and wrath. The diagram above was unrecognizable because it had been sprayed over. I rediscovered it in begin 2022 by accident, after I started reading Scripture end 2021. I have no bias for religion, so basically just look neutrally; and then you see the scheme almost directly.

The formula karma is also gone. In Indian literary, they often write about "fruits of karma" or similar phrases. But that's different in Genesis. There it says: do not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

But yes, what kind of tree is that? Is it the tree of karma? If so, can you interpret this sentence as: do not eat of the fruits of karma.

That's strange: why isn't that allowed? Possible background: if you want to gain power, you can decide that this free and joyful harvesting of karma is now over: stop it, unless we, authorities, upper class, approve.

You don't have to formally cut down the tree, but from now on it is under its control, and in this case, not by Brahmins, but by Jews. And preferably under the power of the Jewish God.

I assume people have deemed this control necessary. But I suspect this is risky: you're essentially replacing the concept of karma with power.

That's risky. If you introduce karma, you don't simply have to comply with what others decide about you; you can withdraw from "evil powers." Just look at the teacher's example: you don't simply have to be downplayed by someone. It seems a step back to be complying too much with strict teachers, who demand discipline.

And that car example: what should I have done in the backseat of the car as a five-year-old? I had no power; only karma can get you out. Also a step back if you only rely on power: sometimes you have none

Figure 2: if you shift focus on priests and God, the level of being can significally drop;

where is thinking power, the power to think yourself? dropped from 70% to 10%?

and where is life quality? also dropped to 10%

There might also be a kind of boomerang effect: if you generate karma, negative energy might react and you also have to stand that. After that incident with the teacher, I got a sharp look from her, but you can stay calm and just go back to your seat: sorry but ciao.

The same with the car thing. Right afterward I had a hallucination of a male figure on the street, some kind of mafia figure, who they probably call God in religion.

I think simply because the mind can automatically envision possible scenarios for what has happened: if your father is kicked out of reality so brutally, there must be a fierce power behind it, some kind of maffia

But that powerful man got a fair amount of criticism from me: what are you doing there doing nothing? Can't you help? Or are you trying to hurt us? Can't you see I'm only a child!?

This last point might be important for those who doubt whether karma is free, or whether it must be distributed through a God: according to the believers, karma can only work through God. But then, of course, through a God who is worshipped; not driven away.

I've realized that I may never be able to prove whether the hallucination was real or not, though it seems plausible it was not real. But I can prove that I received karma without the necessary worship, as of my defiant behavior.

The traditional believers might not be able to cope with this counter argument for their statemens.

It's an argument from an angle they're unfamiliar with; and they might not be able to refute it either: a potential end to the old religions.

The Jews don't have these kinds of things; they're based on the principle of power. That does cause them constant problems: different as I do, they constantly go off track and face one crisis after the other.

In fact, they've been "delivered to the gods." They keep misunderstanding what's going on; but in my opinion, the problem is fundamental on their side.

Besides, their constant fiddling with the texts. If you have any doubts, have an open debate about it, like the Indians do, but here, those cryptic formulations in that obscure story are being "secretly" used.

You have doubts and don't dare to admit them; I do have doubts and am trying to have a serious debate about it.

Also, you're slightly glossing over the source references, like changing the names of Brahman and Sarishvati to Abraham and Sarah.

You explicitly add that God changed the name Abram to Abraham; People don't see that other trick of changing Brahman to Abraham because that was the only trick they still learned.

There might be a few other crooks. There was a second theft. At the beginning of the Common Era, the Romans conquered Judah. ​​That was also brutal. In the end they demolished the temple and took the stones to Rome to build the Coliseum. They did that in the year 70 AD.

But of course, you can also demolish the Old Testament and make it the New Testament; then the Romans finally have a professional religion, which they had been longing for. This was also done in 70 AD.

The building blocks are still there because the text passages from Genesis one through four are the same as in John one through four, and a chapter like Exodus twenty is copied into John seventeen. I saw this mid 2022.

So, another case of car theft. They copy the same diagram. But then they paint it over again, with new names: Jesus, Peter, who are they again? It gets increasingly complicated.

The original idea, however, still holds power. People are starting to exercise power again by enslaving others. They don't show self-control by thinking: "That wouldn't be very helpful with karma in mind."

And when those others come, like migration flows, they don't show defiance by saying: "Keep your problems at home, we don't have to let everyone in."

2 Share this discovery

This is already an idea, explaining to people that they've been duped. Maybe I can turn that into a fun scoop, make current religions collapse, and bring back the old ones of karma.

I once jokingly thought: I'll just pass the bill on to India. If those people each pay me a euro, I'll be rich; and then the 400,000 poorest people won't even have to pay.

But this might not be enough for a real scoop. This is still relatively boring, perhaps they don't find it interesting enough, or at the maximum level, for an exception on the History Channel that's only watched by a bunch of nerds. People are more focused on entertainment.

I recently had to compare that to the Grammy Awards in America; the guests looked even more outlandish one after the other; the crazier you look, the greater your chance of making the newspaper and attracting a lot of fans, because people love entertainment.

And you shouldn't just think about the film industry. That's essentially what someone like Nietzsche did: he says very strange things because that's a good way to stand out, and the audience likes that.

So he says: disaster is good, it makes you tough! That's not true: disaster is bad, it gives you PTSD. Try explaining that to people in a cancer ward in a hospital, that disaster is good.

But people often find that far too dull: boring, psychology, yuck, complaining. We want entertainment! So then you get statements like that. Andrew Tate does that too, and it sells like crazy.

So this is what they do in the Bible too: if you write that thinking ability is directly proportional to quality of life, that's far too dull.

But if you write that people ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and that they then saw God's wrath fall on them: what does that mean!

On the other hand, if you look at the Epstein files: what possibly sells even better than entertainment is scandal.

If you look at what the Jews say in Genesis 9, for example, about black Africans: hallelujah! They literally write: Africans are uncivilized black Untermenschen and must be condemned to eternal slavery!

And what about the New Testament, which says: slaves don't complain, not even if their boss is harsh, because Jesus also had a hard time and didn't complain. Aha!!!!

Imagine if this were discovered, how this whole mindfuck business works. That's material for a huge scoop.

There are already accounts on Twitter pursuing this, calling to do to Europa or the Middle East what has previously done to them, from Africa: if those vast numbers of people realize what's going on here, then the Jews really have to watch out, and that's perhaps on a different scale than Epstein's escapades.

But also for Europe; because they're struggling with massive immigration; in a city like Brussels, only ten percent are Belgian.

That's exactly what you get when you throw out the law of karma; Belgians have wreaked havoc in Africa, and if you do that, Africa will then "wreak havoc" on you.

And then you no longer have the "defiance," as I did in the examples above, to challenge it. For example, the ECtHR says: you must admit everyone who requests asylum to the procedure.

If you still have a little defiance, you can say: wait a minute, have you ever heard of things like capacity and social support? We set objective standards for those, so we decide who we select in advance.

For example, many young people from Eritrea come arguing that they'll receive severe punishment for evading military service; then you say, with defiance: we post on the internet that they just have to follow the rules; you communicate that clearly, and problem solved.

That's not happening now, because they don't understand karma; so everyone lives "as if they've been handed over to the gods."

Europe can think: oh my god, we've been completely fooled with that Old and New Testament!! We got stuck in power struggles against our neighbours that could have been prevented. If we'd had karma, we wouldn't have this.

Also Muslims might have a score to settle. Imagine if the Muslims discovered how they were fooled by the Jews.

Just think of a country like Pakistan, India's direct neighbors. Karma is actually a car from India, but the Jews spray-painted it, the Romans did it again, and then sold it to Pakistan: whoah!

You might wonder: this will never amount to anything, people will never figure it out, they'll keep letting themselves be fooled. And I thought recently: I'm so different from other people, I'm too much of an outsider to convey anything.

But then I thought about the Epstein files again. His scandal has come to light, too. And I saw all the reactions, especially from the women who said: we were far too naive. People here have been very naive too, it seems, about religion this time: get the scandal open and end it please.

I think this is also important for feeling better about yourself. I think even some who were actually aware of the risks, the nonsense, the violence, and regret it later: it was crazy, embarrassing; "a wild time," but enough is enough. So I'm curious if this is something that people want to participated in. They might be the new apostles for the coming 2000 year.